erick rendoza

Latest videos

Is this a MIND CONTROL WEAPON?!? Here is what I found.... erick rendoza 12 Views • 1 year ago

Could a speaker aimed at you make you hear voices? Interesting find... Subscribe to OFF GRID with DOUG & STACY: http://bit.ly/2nrYf24 Be part of the TEAM and get a T shirt https://www.bonfire.com/store/....official-off-grid-wi Come to the https://www.homesteadinglifeconference.com/ and learn from experts in their field and of course see us =) ****************************************************************** Now these are Affiliate programs and we get a kick back and in most cases we negotiated a savings for YOU! So when you use the link and coupon code below EVERYBODY WINS! CLYDES GARDEN PLANNER *COUPON CODE "OFF GRID" https://www.clydesvegetableplantingchart.com/ MASON TOPS FERMENTING KIT *SPECIAL DEAL!! http://www.masontops.com/offgrid ALL AMERICAN SUN OVEN *SPECIAL DEAL!! http://bit.ly/2FlBYf4dougandstacycoupon Hud-Son Forestry Equipment sawmills / firewood processors *Coupon Code “OFFGRID” https://www.hud-son.com/dougandstacy/ Redmond Real Salt *SPECIAL DEAL! https://shop.redmond.life/?afmc=OFFGRID *REMEMBER ~ IF YOU USE A LINK THAT HAS A COUPON CODE MAKE SURE TO USE IT FOR YOUR PURCHASE WE ONLY GET CREDIT IF YOU USE THE LINKS ABOVE AND WE THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR SUPPORTING OUR WORK =) ** REMEMBER THE LINKS ABOVE COST YOU NO ADDITIONAL MONEY TO SUPPORT THE CHANNEL AND MOST OF THE LINKS ACTUALLY SAVE YOU MONEY =) *********LET'S GET SOCIAL********* Follow Doug & Stacy: Facebook: https://facebook.com/OFF-GRID-....with-DOUG-and-STACY- Instagram: https://instagram.com/offgridwithdougandstacy/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/2_off_the_grid Join our Facebook group "Homestead Homies" : https://facebook.com/groups/1670530899907249/ Watch more OFF GRID with DOUG & STACY: Recent Uploads: https://www.youtube.com/playli....st?list=PLylxeR881sU Popular Videos: https://www.youtube.com/playli....st?list=PLylxeR881sU Foraging and Fermenting: https://www.youtube.com/playli....st?list=PLylxeR881sU Off Grid Homestead Remedies: https://www.youtube.com/playli....st?list=PLylxeR881sU Email: [email protected] About OFF GRID with DOUG and Stacy In 2010 we decided to sell everything and build a log cabin on 11 acres. We have lived in the log cabin for a decade now with no solar power or wind power plus zero public utilities. We live like the pioneers except in the 21st century. We post videos on social media to encourage people to return to the land and make a living with your family. We teach folks: *Off grid living *Rain water catchment *Cooking with wood *Food growing *Cooking from scratch *Raised bed gardening *Food harvesting *fermenting the harvest *food preservation *Holistic Remedies like Grandma made *How to make money and live this life *storing food in a root cellar *DIY Build projects *Animal Husbandry *Raising Chickens, Guinea, Turkeys and Ducks All of our videos are made to empower you to break free and LIVE YOUR BEST LIFE!

Katz on the Internet: Privacy in the Digital Age erick rendoza 7 Views • 1 year ago

You may be familiar with “cats” on the internet - their furry antics inspired the first-generation of memes - but what about Katz, as in the Katz v. United States ? This Supreme Court decision from the 1960s set the stage for how to interpret privacy rights when confronted with new, potentially intrusive technologies. Now, in the Digital Age, does Katz provide sufficient privacy protection for your personal data? Four experts discuss this modern dilemma in FedSoc Films’ newest documentary, Katz on the Internet: Privacy in the Digital Age. Featuring: Amy Peikoff, Chief Policy Officer, BitChute John Bash, Former Federal Prosecutor Jake Laperruque, Deputy Director, Center for Democracy and Technology Prof. Orin Kerr, UC Berkeley Law School ***** As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speakers. ***** 0:00 - Opening 2:15 - Katz 4:00 - Reasonable Expectation of Privacy 5:46 - Smith & Miller 8:48 - Metadata 10:53 - Carpenter 13:30 - Uncertainty 15:14 - Individual Action 17:37 - Conclusion 19:41 - Credits **** Related links and differing views: American Bar Association, “The Third-Party Doctrine in the Wake of a ‘Seismic Shift’ https://www.americanbar.org/gr....oups/litigation/comm Cardozo Law Review, “A Third-Party Doctrine for Digital Metadata” http://cardozolawreview.com/a-....third-party-doctrine Catholic University Law Review, “Cloudy with a Chance of Government Intrusion: The Third-Party Doctrine in the 21st Century Doctrine in the 21st Century” https://scholarship.law.edu/cg....i/viewcontent.cgi?ar Harvard Law Review, “The Aftermath of Carpenter: An Empirical Study of Fourth Amendment Law, 2018-2021” https://harvardlawreview.org/w....p-content/uploads/20 Michigan Law Review, “The Case for the Third-Party Doctrine,” https://repository.law.umich.e....du/mlr/vol107/iss4/1 New York Law School Law Review, “The Outdated Third-Party Doctrine and the Need for Modernization” https://digitalcommons.nyls.ed....u/cgi/viewcontent.cg Notre Dame Law Review, “A Solution for the Third-Party Doctrine in a Time of Data Sharing, Contact Tracing, and Mass Surveillance Contact Tracing, and Mass Surveillance ” https://scholarship.law.nd.edu..../cgi/viewcontent.cgi St. John's Law Review, "Of Third-Party Bathwater: How to Throw Out the Third-Party Doctrine While Preserving Government's Ability to Use Secret Agents" https://scholarship.law.stjohn....s.edu/cgi/viewconten

Florida v. Riley | 5-4 erick rendoza 10 Views • 1 year ago

Go-go-gadget surveillance state! In this case the Court holds that cops can hover a helicopter over your house and peer into it without a warrant. That set a new standard for the Fourth Amendment - namely that it doesn't really exist, and if you wanted privacy then you should have been richer. Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter. If you're not a Patreon member, you're not hearing every episode! To get exclusive Patreon-only episodes, discounts on merch, access to our Slack community, and more, join at patreon.com/fivefourpod. ________________ ABOUT THE CASE from https://www.oyez.org/ Facts of the case Michael Riley lived in a mobile home situated on five acres of rural land in Florida. Riley owned a greenhouse that was located behind his home; from the ground, the contents of Riley’s greenhouse were shielded from view by its walls and the trees on his property. In 1984, the Pasco County Sheriff’s office received a tip that Riley was growing marijuana on his property. The investigating officer tried to see into the greenhouse from the ground but could not, so he circled in a helicopter at 400 feet and saw what he believed to be marijuana growing inside. Acting on this information, the investigating officer obtained a search warrant, searched the greenhouse, and found the marijuana. Riley was charged with possession of marijuana. Riley filed a motion to suppress the evidence obtained in the search. The trial court granted his motion and held that viewing his property from the air violated Riley’s reasonable expectation of privacy. The District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District, reversed the trial court’s decision and denied Riley’s motion to dismiss the evidence. The appellate court also certified the case to the Supreme Court of Florida, which reinstated the trial court’s order to suppress the evidence. Conclusion Justice Byron R. White delivered the opinion for the 5-4 majority. The Court held that Riley had no reasonable expectation of privacy in this case because anyone could view Riley’s property from a helicopter flying in navigable airspace and figure out what was inside. The police officer did not enter Riley’s land or interfere with it in any way. Furthermore, the manner in which he was flying the helicopter was well within the law; therefore, the police officer was within his rights to view Riley’s property from the air. The Court determined that the police action in this case did not violate Riley’s Fourth Amendment rights. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor filed a concurring opinion in which she cautioned the majority against relying on the fact that the helicopter was flying within Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations. She argued that the FAA regulations were meant to promote air safety and did not protect citizens’ Fourth Amendment rights. Justice William J. Brennan, Jr. wrote a dissenting opinion in which he argued that, like the police activities in Katz v. United States, the officer’s actions in this case violated Riley’s reasonable expectation of privacy. Justice Thurgood Marshall and Justice John Paul Stevens joined in the dissent. In his separate dissent, Justice Harry A. Blackmun argued that the burden of proving that a defendant lacks a reasonable expectation of privacy should rest with the state.

He’s EXPOSING the truth around the 911 hijackers and they don’t like it erick rendoza 131 Views • 1 year ago

Who is really responsible for the 9/11 attacks? Does the story we've been sold actually hold up under a microscope? Our next guest says not even close and he’s been exposing the truth around the 9/11 hijackers and they the official story doesn’t add up. Kevin Ryan is the foremost authority on what happened that day as Editor of the Journal of 9/11 Studies, a board member of the International Center for 9/11 Justice. You can read his work here: https://ic911.org/republished-....books/another-ninete ✅ Sign up for our Free DAILY newsletter, delivered right to your inbox first thing in the morning. ➜ https://redacted.inc ✅ Become a Redacted Rebel VIP and get access to EXCLUSIVE content, live streams, and more! ➜ https://redacted.locals.com ? REDACTED MERCH ? Go grab some Redacted Merch from our store. Go to https://RedactedStore.com and pick some up. When you get it, send photos of you wearing it to [email protected]. Can't wait to see you in it! ? Follow us on RUMBLE: Come follow us on Rumble, a free speech platform, in case anything happens to the YouTube channel due to censorship. https://Rumble.com/Redacted ? Follow Redacted on Twitter: https://Twitter.com/TheRedactedInc ? Read Clayton and Natali's Amazon best-selling book on finance. How To Pay Off Your Mortgage in 5 Years ?? https://amzn.to/3Guh4IC ✅ ? Best Way to Invest in Gold is with Lear Capital ⚡️ ? Call them today at tel:800-613-3557 ? or go to https://LearRedacted.com ⭐️ Get your FREE Gold and Silver investor guides from Lear Capital ⭐️Receive up to $15,000 in FREE bonus metals with a qualified purchase ? Limited Time: Get up to 16 Free stocks with moomoo! Open a free account and claim your free stocks after you make your initial deposits. Click here to learn more ➡ https://redacted.inc/moomoo ? ?? (Australians get 10 Free Stocks when deposit A$2K) T&C Applys: https://redacted.inc/moomoo ? LIVE STREAM SCHEDULE: Monday - Thursday 1PM PST / 3PM CENTRAL / 4PM EST ? Want to bypass chat limits on our LIVE streams? Become a YouTube Channel Member today. This is TOTALLY different than the community over on Locals. Head to this link to join: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCoJhK5kMc4LjBKdiY #redacted #claytonmorris #natalimorris #news #independentjournalists ----- About Clayton and Natali Morris: Clayton Morris is a former Fox News anchor. In Redacted, Clayton and his wife Natali take an in-depth look at the legal, social, financial, and personal issues that matter to you. They want to set the record straight and bring you the stories nobody else tells. Along with the facts and the complete picture, Redacted offers real-world analysis without an agency driven by corporate overloads. With Clayton’s extensive journalism experience, he isn’t afraid to demand the truth from authorities. Redacted is an independent platform, unencumbered by external factors or restrictive policies, on which Clayton and Natali Morris bring you quality information, balanced reporting, constructive debate, and thoughtful narratives. DISCLAIMER: Some of the links in this description and in our videos may be affiliate links, and pay us a small commission if you use them. We really appreciate the support. The content in our Youtube videos SHALL NOT be construed as tax, legal, insurance, construction, engineering, health & safety, electrical, financial advice, or other & may be outdated or inaccurate; it is your responsibility to verify all information. We are not financial advisers. We only express our opinions based on our experiences. Your experience may be different. Investing of any kind involves risk. While it is possible to minimize risk, your investments are solely your responsibility. You must conduct your own research. There is NO guarantee of gains or losses on investments. These videos are for entertainment purposes ONLY. IF stocks or companies are mentioned, we MAY have an ownership interest in them -- DO NOT make buying or selling decisions based on these videos. If you need advice, please contact a qualified CPA, attorney, insurance agent, contractor/electrician/engineer/etc., financial advisor, or the appropriate professional for the subject you would like help with. Linked items may create a financial benefit for our company. Follow Clayton on Twitter: https://Twitter.com/ClaytonMorris Follow Natali on Twitter: https://Twitter.com/NataliMorris

Please note that if you are under 18, you won't be able to access this site.

Latest videos

Language