"⁣Although this article may appear utopian in its conclusions, we nevertheless believe that we should publish it in order to attract the attention of economists and journalists to a question which has hitherto been treated in only a desultory manner and which should, nevertheless, in our day and age, be approached with greater precision. So many people exaggerate the nature and prerogatives of government that it has become useful to formulate strictly the boundaries outside of which the intervention of authority becomes anarchical and tyrannical rather than protective and profitable." [Note of the editor-in-chief of the Journal des Economistes, 1849.]



⁣https://praxeology.net/GM-PS.htm


⁣https://archive.org/details/78...._no-4-largo-in-e-min

⁣https://mises.org/library/equality-unknown-ideal

This is a partial response to the problem of arguments about the subjectivity or objectivity of morality. It is simple to dismiss the importance of language in the debate, but it is necessary to being understood. Ludwig Wittgenstein resolved many of these sorts of issues through a sort of transcendece of the mistaken tendency to take generalizations as meaning. This hurdle must be cleared before anyone can effectively make a worthwhile contribution to topics such as morality or economics.

Original Video: ⁣https://www.mgtow.tv/watch/the....-tfm-show-6-26-2021_



https://manradio.rocks

⁣Anti-Psychologism in Economics: Wittgenstein and Mises
By: RODERICK T. LONG
Abstract. Ludwig Wittgenstein's arguments for the conclusion that
whatever counts as thought must embody logical principles can likewise
be deployed to show that whatever counts as action must embody economic
principles, a conclusion which in turn provides the basis for a defense
of Ludwig von Mises' controversial claim that the laws of economics are a
priori rather than empirical. The Wittgensteinian approach also points
the way toward a transcendence of the intractable disputes among
present-day Austrians over formalist versus hermeneutical, analytic
versus synthetic, and impositionist versus reflectionist interpretations
of economic method.
https://praxeology.net/antipsych.pdf