I had larger manuscript in the works, however, it's too long and relies on a lot of visuals. I have to improve my editing skills before I embark on making it a video. I also have to figure a voice for my channel. I'm still experimenting for now. Hope you like this. <br> <br>I will keep posting short videos for now to garner traction. <br> <br>Here's the manuscripts: <br> <br>In this video I thought to examine how we shroud men's existence in servitude to women. How there's a process I call relativization of manhood, a basing of manhood on womanhood, where manhood is distilled to what suits the females. You see, our societal conception of manhood rests to a deranged extent on what it offers women. I firmly believe that men and women do not originally complete each other. Men are made to complete women. <br> <br> Men are born as non-entities with no inherent value because they are biologically disposable. To endow them with value the women have to find a use for them. The measuring stick for the value of men wholly rests on what women desire. Due to women's capability to give birth and the caretaker role which arises from that, men are demanded to do everything else the women needs as part of their sex role which came to define men's lived experiences or in other words their masculinity, and hence masculinity gets naturally intertwined with utility to females. <br> <br>If the provisioning and protection is valuable to the female, then the men who exudes high levels of virility are high value males, and if she values supportive caretakers then the effeminate men are the high value males in this case. <br> <br>As such, I dare say, the alpha beta dichotomy is a meaningless schism that tricks you into thinking, servitude to women as an alpha man is superior opposite to servitude to women as a beta men. This dichotomy is nothing but a &quot;man up&quot; and become a &quot;real men&quot; gynocentric indoctrination in manosphere-lingo. Alpha and beta men are both functionally the same; they both derive identity and purpose from being a utility to females; they both find solace in their usery for the fear of abandonment of not having a woman, or the scorn for eschewing women. The elation and the glee and pride these alpha men feel at some busted hoe, batting an eye at them shows you that alpha men are just successful simps at dating. <br> <br>Men exist solely as utilitarian objects to the female. That's the cold-hearted truth. Men compete against each other to prove themselves to their potential suiters. In this sexual competition, they display as much willingness to prioritize the female and serenade their endless love songs of servile servitude to the women to showcase their viability and utility, and whoever ends up with the most use value for the potential suiter gets picked. As Briffault's law states, where there's no benefit to be obtained for the female no association with the male occurs. The fact that we are wired biologically to seek to fulfill our evolutionary imperative of reproduction just further fuels this socialization. <br> <br>The traditional patriarchal system utilized this understanding and created a system with checks and balances on both sexes to structure society productively, although it let women off the hook more often than men, and was exceptionally easy on them. It defined a rigid concept of manhood and womanhood and placed restrictions on men and women in order to standardize their sex roles to facilitate family formation. Everybody knew how to navigate the relationship and get a family going. Then the matriarchy began taking hold in early 18th century. Women tore apart all restrictions placed on them, leaving the restrictions placed on men and even strengthening them. You see, matriarchy still has patriarchal elements because they benefit women. <br> <br>There are two prominent ways I identified for relativization of manhood. The first is mainstream media indoctrination and the second is sexual deprivation. Let's talk about the media first. <br> <br>The matriarchal order propagates itself through the gynocentric propaganda it blurts in media. The media works tirelessly to indoctrinate men into being cogs in the United States of the Matriarchy. From youth we are bombarded with messages about women's bodies, feelings, needs and desires. The objective of this is to make men attuned to women's needs. We also see a deluge of traditional portrayals of dating and mating even in these feminist times. This is done to prime men to be a utility, an ATM-machine, for the female.

In 2015, there was a huge debacle about men floundering in academia and social life and failing to launch, especially in jobs and interpersonal relationships. That year saw the popularization of books like &quot;save the males&quot;, &quot;the decline of men&quot;, and &quot;the myth of male power&quot; with many commentators notably on Fox news having lengthy discussions of the rocky future men would face if the current trends continue. <br> <br>A common theme in those discussions and debates among right-wing circles was the push for men to man up, while in feminist circles it was more expressed as becoming a &quot;real man&quot;. For the trad cons, they thought men should follow along the footsteps of their fathers and grandfathers, from educational attainment, employment, home ownership, and eventually marriage; and from the standpoint of the feminists, they urged men to decry their fathers and grandfathers socialization and education as patriarchal, sexist and regressive and to reinvent a concept of manhood that is ancillary to feminism and its ideals. <br> <br>However, that was in vain since those platitudes the right and the feminists regurgitated were ineffective at sparking profound change as the issues afflicting men weren't a personal failure of men. It was systemic. <br> <br>Since the sixties when affirmative action was instituted, our government have made a concerted effort to equalize women's outcome to that of men. Affirmative action functions as a form of reparations for the supposed evils that have befallen women at the hands of men. And it's been just expanding since the sixties. <br> <br>For the years that follow, women would receive more preferential treatments, on top of that, favoritism towards women-led companies and companies that hire mostly women wasn't considered a crime. <br> <br>It's puzzling after many years to still face people who lay the full blame on men for the wreck feminism has brought about. For example, Pordan Jeterson said MGTOW are pathetic weasels, Cucker Carlson would infinitely reprimand men and push them to accept responsibility for which they have no authority, and many others to varying degrees have either attacked men or urged them to play the rigged game anyway. <br> <br> <br>Reason number 1: it's an evolutionary adaptation — men are inherently gynocentric. <br> <br>Males raison-detre from a biological standpoint is to improve the fitness of the species through male-on-male competition. Men are an offshoot of the female. For so long, the species reproduced through replication, and then later on, through asexual reproduction. These two processes are slow in accelerating the evolution of the species. That's where male-on-male competition comes into the picture. If males compete to secure mating rights, then only the fittest would be able to pass on their genes and by extension improve the fitness of the species. That's why sexual differentiation kicked off in our species. <br> <br>The expression of male-on-male competition is not strictly physical. It also includes psychological warfare like intimidation and manipulation. One of the tangible side effects of male-on-male competition is the delayed development of younger males in comparison to younger females, since in earlier times the men that grow up faster and reached adulthood with all that testosterone coursing their veins often died sooner as they challenged the mating rights of other males. <br> <br>And this is where we get to why men put other men down. It's a ingrained evolutionary propensity to be hostile to other men and protect females, which at times is also used as mating strategy, a competition to increase the fitness of the species. <br> <br>These moronic nether apes are beholden to an ancient homo-erectus part of their brain, which speaks volumes to the futility of trying to change their minds. Just leave them be. <br> <br>Second reason: shame of worshiping the golden veejee <br> <br>The men who put us down are cognizant of the aim of their actions. They know they are exalting women at the expanse of their brothers and friends to gain the validation of women. <br> <br>There's a sense of shame linked to being so poon-whipped to the extent you sabotage and hurt other innocent men to get the validation from females. That's why they have to bill it as righteous, just like any shitty person in existence doing bad things. <br> <br>(Continuing...)