darkridr

Liked videos

Female Nature Is A Myth - MGTOW Sandman 1,185 Views • 4 years ago

⁣Sponsor Link:
Body Transformation Made Simple
https://www.transformationmadesimple.com/landing

⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣⁣Sponsor Link 2:
- THE DOLL CHANNEL LLC
- https://thedollchannel.com/.

Sponsor 2 YouTube Link:
- THE DOLL CHANNEL LLC
https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UC68MwmgdZEUL1zgqk

Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBqryAGUl3k

SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandman

Brave Browser: https://brave.com/san644

Hi Everyone Sandman Here,

This video is brought to you by a donation from Mr. Anonymous and here's what he has to say: "Hi Sandman, In my humble opinion, there is a small semantical problem in the manosphere, the term “female nature” is heavily overused because most of the antisocial behaviors common among females that red pill content creators collectively refer to as “female nature” is NOT female “nature”, rather these behaviors are primarily cases of female NURTURE. There’s plenty of statistical and anecdotal evidence to support the fact that the narcissistic, hyper aggressive, and delusional behavior in women is learned and not instinctual. For example, it’s common knowledge that western women were much more feminine prior to the millennials coming of age, the same way that western men were much more masculine prior to millennials coming of age, but the increase in narcissism and aggression in women is fallaciously dismissed as “nature”, which erroneously denotes a genetic mechanism to what are demonstrably changes in cultural and societal ENVIRONMENTAL pressures. But while this environmental causal factor is largely ignored in women, the manosphere hypocritically (albeit correctly) blames indoctrination, single-motherhood, media, the absence of male role models, etc and lots of other ENVIRONMENTAL factors for the pussification of men. Notice how nobody in the manosphere ever refers to “submissive, self-hating, effeminate, sycophantic, simping” as “male nature.” For all it’s complaining about all the unfair feminist double standards against men, this is one anti-male double standard that the manosphere itself is at fault for. I’m certain most individuals in the manosphere are already aware of all of this, but are unaware of the damage this seemingly innocuous misnomer causes. When you call a human behavior “nature”, you are, by definition, calling it genetic and therefore unchangeable in the subject in question in any significant way, we all know that the antisocial behavior of women is learned and NOT genetic, therefore the manosphere unwittingly gives women an excuse for their destructive behavior, which obviously contradicts much of what the red pill exists for, to make men hold women accountable and suffer the consequences of their own actions. And red pill creators compound that problem when they hold men to the double standard of “nurture for men, nature for women” i.e. “men can learn, women can never learn.” We obviously can’t reasonably tell men that they need to “force women to learn responsibility and accept personal consequences, while simultaneously espousing that “women are biologically incapable of learning.” Well Mr. Anonymous thanks for the donation and topic. I'll get to it in just a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Body Transformation Made Simple:

10 images licensed and paid for through BigStock.com. All image licenses are available upon request.

Ad Image Credits:

1. Handsome young fit muscular caucasian man of model appearance workout training in the gym gaining weight
https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-236985280/stoc

2. Muscular young woman with beautiful body doing exercises with dumbbell. Sporty girl lifting weights in gym.
https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-278194480/stoc

Video Motion Graphics Credits:
Particle Wave 4K Motion Background by "Videezy.com"

Jean-Claude Van Damme - License Free Green Screen Footage

Please note that if you are under 18, you won't be able to access this site.

Liked videos

Language