wroger_wroger

Liked videos

Feminists Propose Child Tax, Every Man Should Pay Child Support Even If He Doesn't Have Kids - MGTOW Sandman 382 Views • 2 years ago

Sponsor Link: Moorescarts.com ANDROID DEVICES https://play.google.com/store/....apps/details?id=com. IOS DEVICES https://apps.apple.com/us/app/....moorecart/id16346130 Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XvgYkN5m6io Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428 Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:c Bitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxeDBpkwsLT/ Sandman 2: https://www.youtube.com/@sandman2317 Twitter: https://twitter.com/SandmanMGTOW SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandman Paypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.com Bitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uv Hi Everyone Sandman Here, This video is brought to you by a donation from Terry. He didn't suggest a topic and left it up to me so I wanted to share something I read on the going your own way dot com forum by someone named Lucky Austrian and I quote: "Feminists propose child tax - now every men should pay child-support. The newest fad in feminist circles in Europe is a "child tax" With birthrates only kept on low levels because of immigration, more and more men (approximately. 25%) saying that the ideal number of kids is zero and at the same time basically most of the families with kids consisting of people that should not have kids ... the feminists come up with a new, tricky idea. Basically it means: Child support and alimony is paid by the state and not by the father. Every male has to pay the tax which will be distributed to women with children and companies that employ women that got pregnant. The selling points include men are not burdened by child support anymore and can "move on" without financial burden to their next "family" as are companies not hurt when one of their female employees gets pregnant. The hidden agenda is Women can now have babies with as many bad boys as they want, not caring about financial fitness to support kids as the state will pay all the costs. As now the state is provider and baby-daddy, men would not have any legal father rights anymore, as they do not support the kid. Feminists consider recent developments in the fathers-rights are (like visitation) horrible unjust. The best thing for women is that all men would have to pay even if women did not even let them get a whiff of pussy throughout their life. The ugliest dudes, the weakest beta, all will pay for the kids of the 20% and support them. Women would get more money than a single man can handle to pay to being a single mum should be way easier and birth-rates should rise as basically being a mom becomes a well paid "job" Paying money to companies ensures that companies still hire females as the losses of her getting pregnant are covered, so they still can have their "career" if they wish to do so." unquote Well Terry thanks for the donation and thanks to the guy that posted this topic. I think that eventually something like this will be tried. This story was verified and there are in fact articles on that going your own way post where feminists discuss petitioning the government so it introduces this. Men will be slaves and won't be able to get away from having 20% of their gross income taken away and that's before all of the other taxes. If that happens guys have options too. They choose to work less, retire or just live a minimalist lifestyle to stick it to the ladies. More than likely female governments will just print money and hand it to women regardless of the inflation rate. Men will eventually get tired of that and leave their countries for ones that are more competent ways start saving money in something other than currency. It's scary to think that one day they might get ten Chuds to support 10 of Chad's kids. One of the feminists says that the idea is to separate the child care from the biological producer. Almost making the child a communal responsibility so that a woman doesn't have to take accountability. This is definitely a possibility as fertility rates start to crash below 1 everywhere once virtual girlfriends and loverbots are introduced. Governments will probably resort to radical measures once immigration policies start to fail and their populations start to fall. But if they try to implement what amounts to a bachelor tax then a lot of guys will simply leave their countries. I'm predicting that women will do it when they become the majority of politicians. They are the ones that benefits from the social safety net. If that starts to fail there's no telling what ways they will try and enslave men. Men can go their own way from women relationship wise but not when it comes to finances. Or so it would seem. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Moorescarts:

Please note that if you are under 18, you won't be able to access this site.

Liked videos

Language