Dear Creators, we are proud to announce an amazing affiliate program for you to earn some serious and continual cash. Read about our affiliate progarm here.
Caros criadores, temos o orgulho de anunciar um incrível programa de afiliados para vocês ganharem muito dinheiro de forma contínua. Leia sobre nosso programa de afiliados aqui.
Latest videos
www.foxnews.com%2Fworld%2F2012%2F05%2F11%2Flack-babies-could-mean-extinction-japanese-people%2F&session_token=nafa3n-vL5zNRuPiC5xm-qhNcTF8MTM4NjUzNjQwNkAxMzg2NDUwMDA2
Here is the article i talked about:
"After watching some of your videos I feel mysef being pried away from my tradionalist view of the way the world should be. The type of people I usually look to for answers is the whole ultra far right, proto-facist, might makes right, Nietzschean ilk found at places like inmalafide and counter-currents publishing. Barbarossa pointed out how inherantly fragile the family unit is, women bailed the second they had a chance, therefore this is not the most stable, healthy enviroment to raise children in. The family unit cannot be maintained women men reasserting patriarchial control of women, and this will be unbelievably difficult considering the role modern technology (reproductive and otherwise) has played in their liberation. Patriarchy might not be possible without having to wind back the clock of technological progress. So the only other option is to look for technology to liberate men just as it did women. I get that. But any technology that would have any significant effect, such as the artifial womb, is decades and decades away at a mininum. The question is, what the fuck are we supposed to do till then? If society can even hold that long, then its quite optimistic to think the next Albert Einstein or Nicolla Tesla will be produced in a society consisting largely of women giving birth to bastards spawned only by alpha thugs, PUA's and sperm banks.
But the family unit is the foundation stone of civilisation, that cannot be denied. Despite all its flaws it has been the most stable and just institution to regulate sexuality. One of the only historical alternatives has been polygamy, which excludes huge numbers of men, which must be subsequently kept in line either through despotism, constant warfare or a combination of both. The other is single motherhood slutdom, with only the top tier alpha males procreating, no real male investment in society, therefore material and technological process is absent and disorder, chaos, poverty and violence are the order of the day. To my knowledge, no other system has ever existed in human history. Whilst you offer men alternatives to marriage on an individual level, you have yet to offer a viable, blue print of a post family unit society that might hypothetically exist in the future. I'm fine with men abandoning women and children, starving the beast of the state, as a strategy to hasten the collapse of the system, but how exactly can we build a heathly society afterwards if men don't restablish a patriarchial nuclear family structure? None of you have actually manadged to outline how this could possibly work. I'd love to hear one, because at this point it simply nothing more than utopianism. Not saying it shouldn't ever be attempted, but how would you see something which has never been attempted in history.
I don't see "society", as I define it, as being possibly without men being highly invested in its protection and advancment. Men WILL NOT invest in a society that doesn't afford them the reliable oppurtunity to satisfy there deepest biological needs, to fuck and procreate with women. The nucelar family, rigidly enforced sexual mores, provide most men with this oppurtunity, polygamy, single mother slutdom do not. Do you forsee the artificial womb in combination with widespread legalised prostitution as something that might take of the problem? I don't think it will personally because the primal need to bond, commite and procreate with one woman, or atleast many women in a serial monogamous way (whilst fucking other women on the side), is far to strong, but I'd love to hear your views. Also how could such a society where the nuclear family is not the norm successfully raise emotionally healthy children to be productive members of society? We see what basketcases the children of both single mothers and divorce are, how could we ensure that the products of the artificial womb aren't the same, or do you forsee a way to make sure that even such children manage to grow up recieving equal investment from both their mothers and fathers?
Listen, sorry to make this so long, but I hope you get my point. Male liberation, this is something completlely new, and I just think its silly to promote such a thing without giving a long, detailed explanation about how any other alternative could possibly succeed, what such a society would like, what its morale principles and laws (or lack thereof) would be and how you plan to overcome our own biological shortcomings which propell us to keep repeating the same behaviours again and again. You haven't done this yet, neither has barbarossa, or any other radical MGTOW types. Please do!"
http://colonialquills.blogspot.de/2011/05/in-ye-olden-times-bachelor-tax.html
http://www.neatorama.com/2007/04/19/what-wont-they-tax/#!pb0Kj
http://www.unrv.com/government/julianmarriage.php
http://www.revenue.ie/en/tax/it/leaflets/it2.html
A response to his video......
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=md5JrO4UzEE
A video response to the issue Bernard is covering regarding a young feminists collecting money to 'point out misogyny' in games.
His Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISIQ0Lo5vKU
I made this video as a response to Eugene's video. I also made it in a show of support for Brian Banks. If you can help, no matter in how small a way, please do, not a command, just a plea.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mtOnNqma1I
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ucJbKYS5AV4
Kickstarter project:
http://www.kickstarter.com/pro....jects/1681576010/the
Response to Eugene's Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=finsIpbNGQA
A response to Colonel Absconder's Video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIkQAAd2Hyw
A long and less than perfect response to genderempathy 's Why anti feminists are not helping the mens movement. I am ill at the moment so it is not as clear as I would like it to be.
Gender Empathy:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VNRFHgfjYfI
Girl Writes What:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PqEeCCuFFO8&feature=my_liked_videos&list=LLrEtDxWkIa6YTyTLDqKdqUw
Blog post by Rollo Tomassi
http://rationalmale.wordpress.com/2011/10/03/war-brides/
Sex and Stormtroopers:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new....s/article-2044614/Se
Links:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/articles/199705/lessons-gay-marriage
http://www.uni-koeln.de/wiso-fak/fisoz/conference/papers/p_andersson.pdf
http://www.marriagedebate.com/pdf/SSdivorcerisk.pdf
http://bigthink.com/dollars-and-sex/are-lesbian-marriages-doomed-for-failure
http://jlrransom.wordpress.com/2010/11/23/will-i-ever-get-married/
Links
http://sandwalk.blogspot.de/2009/03/richard-dawkins-on-purpose.html
http://tierneylab.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/08/20/is-there-anything-good-about-men-and-other-tricky-questions/
http://www.nature.com/scitable/definition/population-bottleneck-300
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toba_catastrophe_theory
http://www.epjournal.net/wp-content/uploads/EP05358362.pdf
Links
http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/products/dyb/dyb2006/Table25.pdf
http://www.tinbergen.nl/~gautier/pdffiles/sincity.pdf
http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/English/e20033/marriage.htm
Female Hypergamy in Action
http://www.chinatoday.com.cn/English/e20033/marriage.htm
你就是窝囊
You're useless/a pushover
我干嘛要嫁你呀
Why the hell should I marry you
男人没钱就是垃圾
A man without money is just trash
今天早上买东西的时候...
When we were shopping this morning...
...笑话知道吗?
...being laughed at, you know that?
你要养你爸妈, 我爸妈呢?
You (say) you have to provide for your parents, what about mine?
没钱, 想起来就让我觉得可怕, 你知道吗
No money, the very idea horrifies me, you know that?
说话呀!
Say something!
你这样子真是窝囊
You're such a pathetic pushover.
什么本事都没有, 还想让我和你结婚
You are without any skill, how can you expect me to marry you
算了吧
Let's just call it quits
老是这个样子
You're always like this
说话呀!
Say something!
这个样子咱们算了吧
How about we just call it quits
今晚上我就搬走
I'll move out tonight
[Girl stands up]
算了拜拜
That's it. Bye bye.
[Girl leaves]
Links
http://techcrunch.com/2011/03/20/why-women-rule-the-internet/
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pc7KfQuddwRUk4q3lQ4Zx4_2ATYo3rawy5a1WNc3_Nw/edit?pli=1
http://www.catalyst.org/publication/256/buying-power
http://www.mariko-chang.com/Debt-Women-Men-by-Race.pdf
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Pc7KfQuddwRUk4q3lQ4Zx4_2ATYo3rawy5a1WNc3_Nw/edit?pli=1
This is a on the fly video response to Barbarossa's video, the link to which can be found below:
https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DNNZw49Upa2M%26feature%3Dplcp&session_token=O7mPX4HtyZeldZR98VTk-Zupprh8MTM4NjU1MzI5MUAxMzg2NDY2ODkx
http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/11/15/research-suggests-humans-are-evolving-to-be-dumber/
https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cell.com%2Ftrends%2Fgenetics%2Fabstract%2FS0168-9525%252812%252900158-8&session_token=T52oXaPggNeOfGpeLfewX5xk0TB8MTM4NjU1MzQyNkAxMzg2NDY3MDI2
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/rising-divorce-rate-spurs-controversial-changes-to-chinas-marriage-law/article591185/
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/afghanistan/8857708/Chinas-divorce-rule-dubbed-Law-that-makes-men-laugh-and-women-cry.html#
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2072530,00.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fisherian_runaway
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01647.x/abstract
http://www.duluth.umn.edu/~rmoen/Dld/Moen_1999.pdf
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronald_Fisher
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allometry
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Irish_Elk
http://www.dogheirs.com/tamara/posts/1626-heroic-man-sacrifices-his-life-to-save-a-woman-and-her-dog-from-drowning
http://savageminds.org/2005/06/06/yales-monkey-brothel/
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1700821,00.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2044614/Sex-stormtroopers-How-French-women-fell-Nazi-invaders-Second-World-War.html
http://www.regjeringen.no/nb/dep/ud/kampanjer/refleks/innspill/menneskerettigheter/children_worldwar.html?id=535487
http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/01/10/implications-of-the-apex-fallacy/
http://dalrock.wordpress.com/2011/08/26/why-a-womans-age-at-time-of-marriage-matters-and-what-this-tells-us-about-the-apex-fallacy/
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cs6NL5rPyGM
http://www.health.harvard.edu/newsletters/Harvard_Mens_Health_Watch/2010/July/marriage-and-mens-health
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/01/120118101335.htm
http://www.trendsight.com/content/view/40/204/.
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/living-single/200902/no-getting-married-does-not-make-you-live-longer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_wonvcSe5vo&list=UUrEtDxWkIa6YTyTLDqKdqUw&index=23
http://uk.askmen.com/entertainment/better_look_3800/3804_male-friendship.html
http://www.divorce-lawyer-source.com/faq/emotional/who-initiates-divorce-men-or-women.html
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSWOfVJNZU8
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WLPwObv5yY
Part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZhlsSIqnpM
Due to copyright violation all my videos longer than 15 minutes will be segmented in the future as is the case with this one.
http://www.rockingphilosophy.c....om/2013/06/in-spite-
Whatever. I am just going to do what I'm going to do.
http://www.avoiceformen.com/vi....deo/stardusk-steps-o
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSWOfVJNZU8
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WLPwObv5yY
Part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZhlsSIqnpM
Due to copyright violation all my videos longer than 15 minutes will be segmented in the future as is the case with this one.
http://www.rockingphilosophy.c....om/2013/06/in-spite-
A response to manwomanmyth's video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9J7EmTG57xI
Part 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YSWOfVJNZU8
Part 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WLPwObv5yY
Part 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZhlsSIqnpM
Due to copyright violation all my videos longer than 15 minutes will be segmented in the future as is the case with this one.
http://www.rockingphilosophy.c....om/2013/06/in-spite-
The video I infringed upon:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cbk980jV7Ao
Just a little conversation we had....
I apologise for the extended ending with black, I tried to fix it but after 2 tries I did not want to go through it again, too much time. Apologies again.
Young Turks
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-YqY9Dtx7Mk
A great compilation
Check out his channel:
http://www.youtube.com/channel..../UCppoDrbRZ7xOv9c0HQ
Link to the video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-ERB7BMQgU
Audio side (all I have for now) of the video that got flagged and deleted on Stardusk's channel, resulting in a copyright strike, and subsequently limits Stardusk to making 15 minute videos only.
Stardusk's channel:
http://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fuser%2FStardusk&session_token=zMflQjPKWnFseTthapBVvRHxZpJ8MTM4NjYxMzE1N0AxMzg2NTI2NzU3
-Like with thosepeskydames, the flagger uploaded the video in question to youtube himself. Stardusk took a shot from the video and used it as a still for a couple of seconds (!) in his video.
This is NOT a copyright infringement. This is fair use. The flagging of Stardusk's video and the subsequent strike on his channel is nothing but a knee-jerk reaction of a douche, or a simple attempt to bully and harass people with opinions not in line with his own.
It should be noted, that in order to defend oneself against copyright infringement claims, one has to accept that all personal information is sent to the plaintiff by YT. Since there is no way of knowing the plaintiff is who he claims to be, the potential for abuse (ie. doxxing) only helps build the case against bullies who use this strategy to leave anonymous users defenseless.
Video infringed upon
http://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DCbk980&session_token=zMflQjPKWnFseTthapBVvRHxZpJ8MTM4NjYxMzE1N0AxMzg2NTI2NzU3
Flagger's channel
http://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fuser%2Fhughnewma&session_token=zMflQjPKWnFseTthapBVvRHxZpJ8MTM4NjYxMzE1N0AxMzg2NTI2NzU3
Flaggers facebook
http://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fkurtkuennefi&session_token=zMflQjPKWnFseTthapBVvRHxZpJ8MTM4NjYxMzE1N0AxMzg2NTI2NzU3
Flaggers twitter: @KurtKuenne
NB: all 'identifiers' above provided on the flagger's own channel.
===YT global TOS, excerpt from section 6 C: ==========
You also hereby grant each user of the Service a non-exclusive license to access your Content through the Service, and to use, reproduce, distribute, display and perform such Content as permitted through the functionality of the Service and under these Terms of Service.
.
http://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fstatic%3Ftemplat&session_token=zMflQjPKWnFseTthapBVvRHxZpJ8MTM4NjYxMzE1N0AxMzg2NTI2NzU3
============================================
===YT guidelines for fair use:======================
1: The purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes
Courts typically focus on whether the use is "transformative." That is, whether it adds new expression or meaning to the original, or whether it merely copies from the original. Nonprofit educational purposes tend to be considered fair more often than commercial uses, but it is not automatic one way or the other.
2: The nature of the copyrighted work
Using material from largely factual works is more likely to be fair than using purely fictional works.
3: The amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole
Borrowing small bits of material from an original work is more likely to be considered fair use than borrowing large portions. However, even a small taking may weigh against fair use in some situations if it constitutes the "heart" of the work.
4: The effect of the use upon the potential market for, or value of, the copyrighted work
Uses that harm the copyright owner's ability to profit from his or her original work are less likely to be fair uses. Courts have sometimes made an exception under this factor in cases involving parodies.
http://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Fsupport.google.com%2Fyoutube%2Fbin&session_token=zMflQjPKWnFseTthapBVvRHxZpJ8MTM4NjYxMzE1N0AxMzg2NTI2NzU3
============================================
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrS7Yu284BA
Link: http://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Frhrealitycheck.org%2Farticle%2F2012%2F02%2F23%2Fwhat-do-artificial-wombs-mean-women%2F&session_token=VZflQ7mNHf-JziHIIrAMRJWb8i18MTM4NjYxMzgxN0AxMzg2NTI3NDE3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uiPP2bS4UGM
Link:
http://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http%3A%2F%2Frhrealitycheck.org%2Farticle%2F2012%2F02%2F23%2Fwhat-do-artificial-wombs-mean-women%2F&session_token=VZflQ7mNHf-JziHIIrAMRJWb8i18MTM4NjYxMzgxN0AxMzg2NTI3NDE3