Hitler's Socialism: The Evidence is Overwhelming | TIK History

Meus Outros Canais: <br>Linktree: https://linktr.ee/gab_figueiro <br>Rumble: https://rumble.com/user/gabfigueiro <br>Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channe....l/UCx2Q5RBUONYO5A7vY <br>Cos.tv: https://cos.tv/channel/33700942577575936 <br>MgtowTV: https://www.mgtow.tv/@gabfigueiro <br>Bitchute: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/d254x5zSWGQo/ <br>Odysee: https://odysee.com/@Libertar_09:7 <br>GabTV: https://tv.gab.com/channel/gab_figueiro <br>Dailymotion: https://www.dailymotion.com/dm...._7886cfdf31391d3d770 <br>Vimeo: https://vimeo.com/gabfigueiro <br> <br>Título Original: Hitler's Socialism: The Evidence is Overwhelming <br>Publicado em 13 de Fevereiro de 2023 <br>Créditos: TIK History <br>Publicação Original: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLHG4IfYE1w <br> <br>Descrição Original do Autor: <br> <br>320.480 visualizações 13 de fev. de 2023 <br>&quot;I am a socialist.” - Hitler, from his &quot;Zweites Buch&quot; (Second Book) Page 50. <br> <br>Some continue to believe that Hitler and National Socialism wasn't REAL Socialism. Some believe that the totalitarian State of the Third Reich had no power at all, and that the market was 'free'. They want to believe that Hitler and his State &quot;privatised&quot; the industries, and had NO control over the economy. Worse, they even think that Nazism didn't call for the creation of a 'People's State' after the conquest of Lebensraum. Yes, 80 years after the events in question, many are still pushing a contradictory narrative that directly goes against the overwhelming evidence pointing towards the complete opposite conclusion, and then refuse to even consider the possibility that they might be wrong in their interpretation. Well, having produced a 5 hour video on this subject (link <br> <br> • Hitler's Socialis... ) only for it to be ignored and dismissed by my critics, and my supporters requesting a shorter version, I've created a condensed and updated video that hits all the main points. Using numerous primary and secondary sources, this video shows the substantial amount of flaws in the Marxist-denialist argument, and presents a solid interpretation of the evidence that makes much more sense than the denialist argument ever has. <br> <br>This video is discussing events or concepts that are academic, educational and historical in nature. This video is for informational purposes and was created so we may better understand the past and learn from the mistakes others have made. <br> <br>Follow me on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/tikhistory/ <br> <br>⏲️ Videos EVERY Monday at 5pm GMT (depending on season, check for British Summer Time). <br> <br>The thumbnail for this video was created by Terri Young. Need awesome graphics? Check out her website https://www.terriyoungdesigns.co.uk/ <br> <br>- - - - - <br> <br>? BIBLIOGRAPHY / SOURCES ? <br> <br>The source list is provided at the end of this video's PDF Script, which you can find here https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D76x... <br> <br>Full list of all my sources https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/... <br> <br>Photo by Pixabay: https://www.pexels.com/photo/agreemen... <br> <br>- - - - - <br> <br>⭐ SUPPORT TIK ⭐ <br> <br>This video isn't sponsored. My income comes purely from my Patreons and SubscribeStars, and from YouTube ad revenue. So, if you'd like to support this channel and make these videos possible, please consider becoming a Patreon or SubscribeStar. All supporters who pledge $1 or more will have their names listed in the videos. There are higher tiers too with additional perks, so check out the links below for more details. <br> <br>https://www.patreon.com/TIKhistory <br>https://www.subscribestar.com/tikhistory <br> <br>Thank you to my current supporters! You're AWESOME! <br> <br>- - - - - <br> <br>ABOUT TIK ? <br> <br>History isn’t as boring as some people think, and my goal is to get people talking about it. I also want to dispel the myths and distortions that ruin our perception of the past by asking a simple question - “But is this really the case?”. I have a 2:1 Degree in History and a passion for early 20th Century conflicts (mainly WW2). I’m therefore approaching this like I would an academic essay. Lots of sources, quotes, references and so on. Only the truth will do.