MGTOW Are The Terrorists Of The Manosphere?

Start with taking away civil liberties of women and gutting the 19th amendment. What should be pushed on the karens want to take away the 2nd fine put the 19th in the same bill you watch back flips.

I also doubt these are Muslim men, it's more than likely women feminists from America pretending to be Muslim men. Nice try ladies.

I've gotten quite a few consistent references from people that live in the middle east telling me that the muslims have adopted a lot of more traditional leftist orthodoxy, apparently to appeal to 'western investors'. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia for example, since the death of the last king, has (supposedly) made gradual changes to be "more westernized" (READ: feminism). The quranic doctrine is taking it full in the ass and the men are doing nothing about it, or so I keep hearing...... point being, maybe they actually are muslims. Just saying.

@RoboCat: maybe, but you got to understand that Saudi Arabia has only gotten this western indoctrination for the past 5 years, they wouldn't change this quickly within an 5 year period of time, in the U.S it took 100 years to get to this point in the progression of feminist indoctrination. Realistically the changes wouldn't be this quickly.

@KEEPER: Wrong. There are two differences at play that make the speed organic rather than not. One is technology, mainly the internet. The second is that the U.S. is not built to be subservient to religion the way muslims do in places like Saudi Arabia because the U.S. has separation of church and state. This is a big deal because orders from royalty or religious leaders are strictly obeyed in places like Saudi Arabia. As a result, their attempts to become more "westernized" (corrupted with new forms of leftism) have been very fast compared to the U.S. Basically, it is absurd to pretend the U.S. in 1920 is the same as Saudi Arabia in 2020. Don't be a joke.

@RoboCat: I suppose you have a point given the advancements, however I can definitely see this effecting the Muslim women in UK as well as the ones in the U.S. but even then in Saudi Arabia, it would still take more time, technology changes access accessibility, however this wouldn't change all of their laws within this much time, I will admit advancements can speed things up, but I still don't think they are this far in their progression unless they were willing to make this trade in the form of something more of value than their thousands year old religion. Obviously we are basing this off of 2 alleged Muslim men, but I doubt they come from Saudi Arabia given their progression, but again I can see this in the full blown western civilization's as this seems more accurate.

@KEEPER: Eh, maybe you will be proven to be correct after more time has passed. For now let us agree to disagree.

I don't think that these are men or Muslim men. I believe that they are feminists from America posing as Muslims men. It wouldn't be the first time they have tried this.

The muslim women who moved to London have mostly become modern western women. Many of them still play saints around their families, but in reality cheat on their already secret boyfriends and rack up more abortions than native English women. And you know what happens when they are in their mid 20s? They get married to a believer, a muslim man who thinks he married a traditional women, but only her peers know what she was up to at University & on those late shift at the part time job.

@Husqvarna: I wonder if the "potential" husband (or elder family member) still checks for her virginity? Should make for "interesting" discussions, if she seems a bit, uh more flexible(?).

@sauger1001: I don't think that happens anymore, even if it did, she'd have a platitude of excuses ready. All I know is, that after years of working, studying and even being in a short term relationship with one of these Muslim women they are the same as a standard plane Jane if not worst. One of the men that I worked with told me that if her parents would fine out, there was a chance that it would result in a honour killing when she went back to Algeria. That's a big risk to take for a few months of fun between breaks, she's probably married by now and the sucker thinks he is serving god.

@DaisyThornton: YOUR A SCAM GET OUT ! SCAM SCAM SCAM SCAMSCAMSCAMSCAMSCAM! !

@DaisyThornton: YOUR A SCAM GET OUT ! SCAM SCAM SCAM SCAMSCAMSCAMSCAMSCAM! !

@DaisyThornton: YOUR A SCAM GET OUT ! SCAM SCAM SCAM SCAMSCAMSCAMSCAMSCAM! !

@DaisyThornton: YOUR A SCAM GET OUT ! SCAM SCAM SCAM SCAMSCAMSCAMSCAMSCAM! !

@DaisyThornton: YOUR A SCAM GET OUT ! SCAM SCAM SCAM SCAMSCAMSCAMSCAMSCAM! !

@DaisyThornton: YOUR A SCAM GET OUT ! SCAM SCAM SCAM SCAMSCAMSCAMSCAMSCAM! !

@Husqvarna: now this progression I can understand. The Saudi Arabia example wouldn't be accurate to thus, but this example makes more sense in its progression. Once a women is fully westernized, she's already a lost cause unless her rights were taken away.

@Bagoodman: I realize your hearts in the right mind by shewing away the spam account, but the more effective way would be to contact Amr with the link of the spam account and let him know that that's spam or scam and he will take care of it eventually.

@KEEPER: yes I know .. But If you do this it pushes all of her notifications down and if there is any suckers that fall for that crap she cant get back to them to scam them . He he he .. Phuck her & her Scam !

@Bagoodman: in my experience with these spammers, they never listen or even look at replies. because i used to do what you do, spamming the spammer. now i just get the link to their channel and copy and paste into AML's chat and let him take care of it. i wish he gave me the ability to get rid of them myself as i have proven to be trust worthy in these situations. but that hasn't happened yet. so for now i just send them to him.

@KEEPER: He has a lot to do to keep the channel going so I just take a second and fill up her Box ... Pun intended LoL

@Bagoodman: that's why I volunteer my help, I know he can't afford a staff. But who knows maybe he can make it happen into the future of this site.

@KEEPER: Yeah I offered to help too but he's a proud Man. It's all good . 8^)_

@Bagoodman: I would still send him yes he is proud, but I have noticed that he makes changes if enough people talk about them. Many of the things that we use right now on the website where are ideas that I pitched in his Direction. And he may not have done them right away, but he thought about it. And he releases videos every once in awhile about that progress, I need talk about the cons and Pros which causes people who actually care about the site to come up with ideas in that how to compromise or make better. Because at the end of the day most of us just want a place where we can do what we want outside of YouTube another bullshit websites. Like for example a week ago he talked about the live stream capabilities and he did the math a little wrong when he originally talked about it. But people in his comment section including me we're trying to convince him that it might be cheaper 2 use audio live streams instead of full on video because we care about the website I only wanted to continue to exist and not be taken out by one podcast that's six or seven hours straight and has thousands of viewers eating up all that bandwidth. See we want him to be successful, but we also want a website that has some special features but we are willing to compromise some of the special features in order to keep this boat afloat. And he said he would consider these ideas.

@KEEPER: Most of the time I don't have the time to watch a 1-3 hour vid on any thing .

@Bagoodman: i'm not asking you to do this. and i don't understand why your bringing this up?

@Bagoodman: oh, your talking about live streams, i get it now.

@Bagoodman: the point is, we were trying to save him money and keep this website alive, the community is willing to help if they feel like there's a possibility that it could effect the website negatively, if the live streams end up being too costly, we don't want it to cause the website to fail, we want it to succeed at all costs. so we are willing to work with him in order to keep this site alive even if it means taking some features away in order to preserve the website.

@KEEPER: Maybe he could do a Jerry Luis type live stream Once a year and ask for Donations . Everyone could do a 10$ pledge . Might be just the boost the channel needs . I Don't know just spitballing an idea .

@Bagoodman: the way it works right now, has to do with membership status and splitting of the donations. but it's also based off how many users are watching the stream at a time. so if the stream has 200 users watching the live stream, that equals to 60GB a minute, but if the stream goes on for more than a few hours like TFM's streams do, it adds up to hundreds of thousands of terabytes per hour streamed. the server costs are crazy high, then say more ppl join the live stream causing that number to raise even higher. at the end of the day, it's just way to costly. but if the stream was reduced to audio only, it would reduce the amount of bandwidth usage significantly and be an much more viable option in the end, the video can always be uploaded later onto the site as the quality of the video is already reduced based on the users membership status. the free accounts can't view any videos higher than 480p resolution, and the accounts that only cost a dollar can't view any videos over 720p. and the accounts that higher higher have unlimited access to the higher resolutions. however some videos uploaded aren't always above 240p because that channel is trying to save space on what they uploaded as well as limit their upload times, i know i do this when i upload an podcast onto my channel. but some other folks might want better quality, and they can upgrade if they want to add that nicer quality. for me personally it's mostly my internet speeds aren't as good, so that's why most of my videos are low res, but i also prefer it in most cases as i want to keep the costs down for the website while i still share my videos.

@KEEPER: To me I have no need to look at a dude talking to me 720 . I don't need to look at the guy the information is enough ! .

@Bagoodman: i agree, so i hope Amr put's aside his pride and realizes this is the correct option if he want's his website to survive long enough, youtube has been doing a slow purge for the past decade, but it's getting more folks to leave youtube which means they go to other websites looking for their pass times, and one day he may not be ready when a shit ton of folks start flooding into the website, i just want him to have the infrastructure set up ahead of time to prevent such an situation from destroying him. so i'm glad you understand what i'm talking about.