MGTOW Arguments Challenge Accepted - Anti-MGTOW

7:42 It is mentioned in EVERY SINGLE history book ever written. ALL of them. Not the "Term," but the principle of men being expendable, women being protected is ingrained throughout ALL of human history. You TRY to appear more intelligent than you are, and when you make such a ridiculously absurd statement it makes me wonder if you've even graduated from high school. Your statement is so laughably easy to disprove, any 5th grade student could do it. Even in modern times tribal societies practice this. The men hunt, and take the risks, and the women gather. The men fight the tribes wars, and the women are protected. In todays world it is manifested in the unequal treatment of men in the courts, and in domestic situations, and public assistance. Also a woman can abdicate her parental responsibilities by simply dropping off the baby at a hospital, or firehouse, meanwhile men have been forced to pay 18 years of child support for a child that isn't even theirs. Regret is rape, consent for sex can be withdrawn days, or weeks later, but ONLY by the woman. #believeallwomen #metoo #allmenarepigs #allmenarerapists #killallmen. These lists, and conditions go on, and on, and men have died from them. But your cold dead soul is so slavishly dedicated to your pharisaical beliefs that you prefer men to remain enslaved, and 80% of the suicides. Blind guide. Evil.

6:05 M.G.T.O.W is a mostly western nation philosophy. Hard religion, and patriarchy do NOT exist in ANY western modern legal systems anymore. M.G.T.O.W is a right now, right here philosophy for the conditions that exist here, and now, NOT 1862, or in some backwater, ass backwards shit stain country. Times have changed. M.G.T.O.W deals with what IS, not what we wish it IS, but what IS. Warning men to avoid situations, and potential life destroying consequences, so they don't end up homeless, or one of the 80% of completed suicides is what some INDIVIDUAL men in the M.G.T.O.W online community do. It is a way to show camaraderie, and to SAVE LIVES!

5:08 The differences between feminism and M.G.T.O.W could not be ANY clearer. Only someone that either has ZERO knowledge of the two, or someone like you, that is willfully blinded by his own agenda could possibly equate the two.

1. Historical FACTS. Feminism is now, and has always been since it's beginning, an organized movement with the goals of ENGAGING society in order to effect changes in favor of feminists/women. E N G A G E M E N T ! ! !

2. Tactics include... Gatherings, leaders, fundraising, organizations, marches, protests, disruptions, riots, political campaigns, and candidates, infiltration of academia, entertainment, and the media, both mainstream, and social, with the agenda of changing the curriculum, and controlling the narrative. Censorship of any view other than their own, and the destruction of ANY all male spaces. Actual feminist quote... "Men are finding places on the internet where they don't feel so alone, and that is what's so dangerous."

3. M.G.T.O.W has always been, is now, and always will be, a philosophy of DISENGAGEMENT. A philosophy for men about how to best live his life in mostly western legal systems. How to avoid the potential legal, and financial consequences of female/state entanglements. It is not FIGHTING for my best interests, it is LIVING for them.

4. NO leaders, organizations, meetings, marches, protests, political campaigns, or candidates. No taking over the media, or entertainment, or academia in order to "CHANGE" anything. You religion obsessed trad-cons, and you atheist blue haired feminists can just keep on doing what you do. Don't change your thinking, or behaviors. Get married, or be a lesbian, get married to a tree, or yourself, ( I don't care. ) As long as I don't have to pay for it, protect it, or provide sperm for it, I'm all good.

5. You might find some superficial similarities in rhetoric, but that is like saying a pop-tart is an I-phone because they are the same shape, and to do so is intellectually dishonest, and bankrupt.

My last statement...your argument about single mothers is so pathetic. First...you again compare things that are not the same. A widower is not the same as a single mother, nor is a woman escaping an abusive partner (although, she did choose him and likely knew he was abusive before the child came along), nor is the man that dumps his wife for a newer model. Latest stats show that women initiate divorce 75-80% of the time...so there are plenty of women choosing to be single. No way in the world you are going to suggest that 80% of men are all bad. But...the true definition of single mother is the woman who is not married, gets pregnant, and decides to have the child anyway. Remember octomom? She was single...had two kids already...and impregnated herself with eight children. Yeah...these are the brave women that are doing the best they can. Over 70% of black women are single mothers, nearly 40% Hispanic and nearly 30% white women. These numbers were 25%, 15% and 10% respectively before the welfare state began in the 1960s. Your arguments are not as well thought out as you believe they are.

One right that a woman has that a man does not...the right to not be a parent. A woman can unilaterally decide to become a parent if is pregnant and the man does not want to be a parent. A woman can unilaterally decide to not be a parent if she is pregnant even if the man wants to be a parent. While I support abortion...no woman should be forced to have a child she does not want...a man should not be forced to be a parent and should not be force to financially support a child he does not want...assuming the two involved are not married. Changing this law would drastically reduce single motherhood and unwanted pregnancy overnight. With the financial incentive taken out of the equation...women would be more careful not to 'accidentally' get pregnant and surely wouldn't get pregnant on purpose until they are married.