Self Inflicted part 4 - Mgtow

Esther Villar is a JEW and she looks like a jar of Gefilte Fish. A feminine woman is valuable IF society has rules to keep her well regulated. If she understands the value of playing by the rules, she is smart. No man wants a combative and disloyal woman. All a feminine woman has to do is look pretty, make her man look good in society, keep his stomach full and his balls empty. Jews told women to abandon all qualities that gave them social value. Once such qualities are willfully rejected, they'll never get them back.

@InfiniteMushroom: Really? So you will be happy to spend your hard earned money on a woman who is feminine. Wow

@Pale_Profit: I was pondering a hypothetical situation and even reflecting on long forgotten times when a woman WAS worth the risk. Yes, I am old enough to remember. Today, of course, that's impossible. Don't forget that Esther Villar is a fucking JEW. Her contempt for "feminine" women is loaded with Jewish baggage that needs to be inspected before accepting it as truth.

I think Esther Vilar didnt have comtempt for feminine women. She had contempt for women who used their feminine privledge to abuse men. Alice Schwarzer, on the other hand, had plenty of contempt for feminine women and was one of the many German feminists who threatened Esther's life.

@Eggy_Noggy: Good point but, read Esther V's quote again. To say that a feminine woman is stupid is to say that she is NOT using her wiles to take advantage of men. Don't forget that Esther V is a JEW and thus cannot be trusted. A feminine woman, way back when such were valued, is smart because she knows that by playing her role, the man plays his and both benefit. Also known as the old Social Contract. It's been dead so long that only the Baby Boomers (like me) can remember when there was still some give and take.

@InfiniteMushroom: I dont quite see that quote as an attack. In actual context... shes RIGHT! Even back in the good old days of the social contract, Women, even then, employ tons of mind-games (or wiles ) to attract men. Men just didnt see them as such. And what i think you might be forgetting is that women create the conditions of those contracts . Otherwise, they will not marry. The word "Wiles" means : ploys, tricks, devices, lures, manoeuvres, dodges, ruses, artifices, subterfuges, stratagems, contrivances and so on. Wearing make-up is a good example. Most cofident married women have a story about how and what they had to do to get their "Man". And almost all of them had to step outside of their own comfort zones to do it. Weather its wearing a dress or wearing something they normally dont wear to get his attention, i see this all as engaging in wiles. Ive read her book a few times in this life she states more facts than fiction.

@Eggy_Noggy: Fair enough. Wiles or not, as I remember, women were once worth the risk and that was the main point. They were worth the risk because the Social Contract was in force. Sadly, I grew up in a time when that Contract was still around but, being undermined. It's been dead for many decades now.

@InfiniteMushroom: You're right about that.... At one point in time, women were well worth the risk and once they entered the contract, they stayed true to it and the man they choose to marry. Back in the good old days, any harlot, jezebel or trash was scolded by other women in her peer group untill she got her act togather. Today, those women are celebrated and considered 'strong'. Its a sad state of affairs.

They're not even worth that.

@GhostPlodderES: Agreed. Our energy is something we need at this point. Every ounce of it matters now moreso than ever.