close

Dear Creators, we are proud to announce an amazing affiliate program for you to earn some serious and continual cash. Read about our affiliate progarm here.


Caros criadores, temos o orgulho de anunciar um incrível programa de afiliados para vocês ganharem muito dinheiro de forma contínua. Leia sobre nosso programa de afiliados aqui.

Up next

Autoplay

The Evolution of Gasoline

14 Views • 05/19/23
Share
Embed
Download
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
209

▶ Visit https://brilliant.org/NewMind to get a 30-day free trial + the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual subscription <br> <br>Gasoline is a mixture of light hydrocarbons with relatively low boiling points that, at the time, had no significant commercial value and was even seen as dangerous, due to its high volatility. Because of this, It was initially considered a waste product and was often discarded and simply burned off. <br> <br>COMPOSITION OF GASOLINE <br>Despite its public perception, gasoline is not a clearly defined compound but rather a homogenous blend of light to medium molecular weight hydrocarbons. The hydrocarbon types that commonly combine to form gasoline and contribute to its properties as a fuel, are paraffins, olefins, naphthene, and aromatics. Depending on the blend, gasoline can vary anywhere from 32 to 36 megajoules per liter. <br> <br>EARLY GASOLINE <br>Early gasoline produced directly from distillation was known as straight-run gasoline. When gasoline containing sulfur is burned are a major contributor to smog, acid rain, and ground-level ozone. These early gasoline blends, by today’s standards would be unusable in the higher compression engines of today as even the most high-test blends would have an octane ratings below 70, with lesser quality blends going as low as 40. <br> <br>CRACKING <br>By 1910, the rising demand for automobiles combined with the expansion of electrification, created a flip in the product demands of the petroleum industry, with the need for gasoline now beginning to supersede that of kerosene. Coined the Burton process, this technique thermally decomposes straight-run gasoline and heavier oils, cracking the heavier hydrocarbons and depleting their hydrogen to produce more lighter hydrogen rich hydrocarbons. The instability of fuel was also a concern, as the higher levels of unsaturated hydrocarbons produced by thermal cracking were reactive and prone to combining with impurities, resulting in gumming, further exacerbating the problem. <br> <br>CATALYTIC CRACKING <br>In early 1920s, Almer McDuffie McAfee would develop a new refining process that could potentially triple the gasoline yielded from crude oil by existing distillation methods. Known as catalytic cracking, the process heats heavy hydrocarbon feedstock to a high temperature along with a catalyst in a reactor. The catalyst initiates a series of chemical reactions that break the hydrocarbon molecules apart into smaller fragments that are then further cracked and recombined to produce lighter, more desired hydrocarbons for gasoline. <br> <br>Catalytic cracked gasoline had a significantly higher olefin content, and more branched-chain and aromatic hydrocarbons than thermally cracked gasoline, which raised its octane rating. The catalyzing action also produced a fuel with lower sulfur and nitrogen content, which results in lower emissions when burned in engines. <br> <br>FLUID-CRACKING <br>In an attempt to circumvent Houndry patents, Standard Oil began researching an alternative method to catalytic cracking, resulting in the development and fielding of the fluid based catalytic cracking process in the early 1940s. As the catalyst becomes deactivated by build up of carbon deposits caused by the cracking process, the spent catalyst is separated from the cracked hydrocarbon products and sent to a regeneration unit. <br> <br>HYDRO CRACKING <br>During this time period, a new type of catalytic cracking process based on decades of research on hydrogenation, a reaction where hydrogen was used to break down large hydrocarbon molecules into smaller ones while adding hydrogen atoms to the resulting molecules. Its efficiency at producing higher yields of gasoline from heavier oil products led to it being adopted on a commercial scale by refineries around the world during the 1960s. <br> <br>POST LEAD <br>After the phase-out of lead additives in gasoline, the petroleum industry switched to MTBE. MTBE in particular. This phase out of MTBE led to ethanol becoming the primary oxygenate and octane booster in gasoline by the early 2000s. <br> <br>ALKYLATION <br>Beyond additives the process of alkylation also grew in its use to boost octane-ratings. This technique is used to produce alkylates, a high-octane blending component for gasoline. Much like other catalytic process, The acid catalyst is separated and recycled, while the alkylates are separated and unreacted isobutane recycled. The high-octane alkylate is then blended with other gasoline components. <br> <br>ISOMERIZATION <br>Another similarly catalytic technique that began to grow in popularity is gasoline isomerization. This process typically focuses on the conversion of low-octane straight-chain paraffins found in light naphtha into branched-chain hydrocarbons that have a higher octane rating. <br> <br>-- <br>SUPPORT NEW MIND ON PATREON <br>https://www.patreon.com/newmind

Show more
1 Comments sort Sort By
Mark E
Mark E
1 year ago

Interesting video!

0
0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson

Yeah there is certainly a lot going on... It's not just a stinky bucket of funny coloured solvent.

1
0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson

I think there is just too much to know, think about and deal with... BUT it pays to know SOME THINGS - about MOST THINGS.

1
0
Mark E
Mark E
1 year ago

Agreed, and I find most of this stuff interesting, even things that I thought I wouldn't!

0
0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson

@bigintol03: There is so much cleverness in so many things... And people figure out how to do it EASIER, with less resources, less power, in less time, more efficiently - It's like the steam engines - of the railway variety - no matter the scale - they were primarily driven by the need to efficiently use coal... (making this up to illustrate the point) If engine A uses 10 tons of coal, to pull 1000 tons, 100 miles at 40 miles an hour - well they guys making these things study the COAL TYPES, and the principles of COMBUSTION - HOW the coal burns, and thermodynamics and insulation and heat transfer from the fire into the water in the boiler - just tons of things...... so by the time 50 years have gone past they have increased the effiency so Locomotive B, uses 7 tons of coal, to pull 1400 tons, 160 miles - at 60 miles an hour. A lot of deep thought goes into so many details....

1
0
Mark E
Mark E
1 year ago

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: In minds far greater than mine!

0
0
Show more

Up next

Autoplay