Unarmed white man begs for life, shot by police

It's a tough situation and the cop came in with rifle because the people who called them said he had guns, but they were pellet guns, so the officer was amped up

@TelepathicRapist: Now granted the video isn't super brilliant - assuming that he has a gun in his pants, set up, loaded, ready to fire, it is about a second, from the time he starts reaching behind, to when he could have pulled the gun out and started firing it at the cop.... The cop said, keep your hands where we can see them at all times, and the idiot changed the game plan.

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: I just think he shouldn't have told him to crawl instead tell him to turn around lie down interlace hands on back of head and don't move then go and cuff him then pat him down for weapons.

@TelepathicRapist: Watch the timing..... The cop was 1/2 a second on the side of a positive ID, and the cops had said don't stick your hands behind your back....

Do you think this was a righteous kill here bagoodman?

@TelepathicRapist: I think in a trial it's a clean kill . The man was told not to phuck up . However the officer I think had to much adrenaline flowing and did not have to kill this man . The man was trying to comply but made a mistake and reached behind his back . This is why I say there is no room to make a mistake . The video makes my point there. When a weapon is in play things could go awry . This should not have happened but there is no room for a mistake . I hope this answers your Question to your satisfaction .

@Bagoodman: man i dunno man, this is a bit overboard here on the officers behalf in my view. He should have told him to remain prone, interlace hands on head and don't move, then go and arrest him instead of asking him to crawl

@TelepathicRapist: I agree but it did not play out that way and he did not follow instructions to the letter and it got him killed . Just a bad thing all the way around . Very sad thing .