Women’s Rights Activist: Never Use the Language of Trans-Activism — Don’t Give It Any Validation

The territory of which she speaks is how the trans rights movement has backfired on the women's right movement. Women's rights ushered in a political agenda and narrative elevating women to equal men. That's - according to them - there's no differences; anything a man can do, a woman can do. This line of reasoning then opened the door for the trans rights movement to co-opt that same line of reasoning. Namely, we're all equal; differences are simply perceptual, imposed by a cruel patriarchal culture. Anyone can be anything they want to believe themselves to be. The consequence is the trans rights movement is sucking all the oxygen out of the room; the womens rights movement is taking a back seat. Furthermore, trans rights is now a threat to womens rights as biological men begin to dominate in womens sports as trans athletes. The women's rights activates see this as a threat because it exposes their lie of equality. So, in an ironic twist, they want to reject the trans rights movement. A case of be careful what you wish for...you might just get it. The women's rights movement wants to return to the entitled position of claiming victimhood, entitlement, and exceptional treatment but the trans rights movement is preventing that because - hey - we're all equal now, we're all whatever we want to believe, feel, or say we are; biology and objective evidence be damned. So if a man can claim he's a woman, women's righters can't reject his argument because that would expose them as hyprocrites and risk being called transphobic. They've painted themselves into a corner and are now trying to backpedal. Too late, ladies, too late. They will now reap what they've sown.

Yes, but I agree with what she said. I will always refer to "Bruce" Jenner as him, the guy on the Wheaties box.

@Generationless: Likewise!